|
Resigns
Jul 15, 2013 11:34:28 GMT -5
Post by octstuff23/MagicGM on Jul 15, 2013 11:34:28 GMT -5
I understand , but like i said i offered $7.000.000 for Lee because of Batum offer $6.000.000 and i cant see there any great statement that would convinced me "high upside , high injury risk" is very low explanation. Lee is worth more then $7.000.000 but its not me who creates market here its you who approve or not approve trades , re-signings. Also i really dont like when one of TC/Moderators are vetoing without any explanation i mean whats that , you got bad mood or what , maybe you just flip a coin. I belive that Iggy should be allowed to re-sign lower then Batum its a fantasy basketball and what matters here is numbers , not name or leadership or other stuff that matters in real life. Lets just try and find all player that avrg. 14 pts 5 reb 5 assist 1 steal 1 block 2.3 3pts over 80% FT , yea go and try and from those 7 categories i just named Batum vs Lee is 5-2 so ...yep keep good decisions.
|
|
|
Resigns
Jul 15, 2013 12:25:26 GMT -5
Post by fernans (MIAMI HEAT) on Jul 15, 2013 12:25:26 GMT -5
From a completely unbiased standpoint, taking into account the 2012-2013 season, I see them being as relative equals. Batum is higher in PPG, 3P%, and FT%, with Iguodala higher in everything else. They are not separated by more than 0.5 in all other stat categories besides points. Batum is 24, Iguodala is 29. Batum has played in 80% of games last 4 seasons, Iguodala has played in 93% of games last 4 seasons.
Perfect example of proven commodity vs high risk/high reward. Iguodala is proven commodity, while Batum, already at the level of Iguodala, can improve, depending if he can stay healthy. Age is a huge factor here, Batum's contract will take him to 28 years old before option, Iguodala's at 33 before the option. Because the precedent has been set with a $6M contract (arguably about $1M too low in my opinion), I see no problem with Iguodala being offered $5M (also about $1M too low in my opinion), as Batum, age 28 at $6M would be more favorable than Iguodala, age 33 at $5M.
|
|